Definition – Euler’s constant

Contents
1. Definitions
2. e_n is an increasing sequence
2. e_n converges
3. The derivative of e^x

1. Definition

Euler’s constant, written e, is defined as the limit,

e = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} (1+\frac{1}{n} )^n = 2.7182818...

2. e_n is an increasing sequence

Recall that, for a set of n real numbers, their geometric mean is less than or equal to the arithmetic mean. Now consider the set of (n+1) numbers,

\underbrace{(1+\frac{1}{n}), ..., (1+\frac{1}{n})}_{\text{n times}}, 1

Now, based on their geometric vs arithmetic means,

\sqrt[n+1]{(1+\frac{1}{n})^n} \leq \frac{n+2}{n+1} = 1 + \frac{1}{n+1}

Finally, raising both sides to the power of n+1, we obtain,

(1+\frac{1}{n})^n \leq (1 + \frac{1}{n+1})^{n+1}

Ie, e_n \leq e_{n+1}. \square

3. e_n converges

It can be proven that e has an upper bound (pick any n\in\mathbb{N} such that n \geq 3). Since e_n is increasing and bounded above, it follows that e_n must converge to some limit.

3. The derivative of e^x

Theorem \frac{d}{dx} e^x = e^x

Proof

We first use the definition of the derivative of a function f(x) = e^x. From this definition, we have,

\begin{array}{ccc} f'(x) &= &\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{e^{x+h} - e^x}{h} \\\\ &= &e^x \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} \\\\ &= & f(x) \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} \end{array}

It now remains to determine the value of \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} . We have two cases. The first case is if h = \frac{1}{n} for some n\in\mathbb{N} and the second is when h cannot be written in this form, but is still an element of the real numbers.

To prove the first case, h = \frac{1}{n}. Then, note that

(1+\frac{1}{n+1})^n \leq e \leq (1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1} \leq (1+\frac{1}{n-1})^n

For all n\in\mathbb{N}. Ignoring the 3rd expression, and taking the n-th root of all three remaining expressions,

1+\frac{1}{n+1} \leq e^{1/n}  \leq 1+\frac{1}{n-1} \iff \frac{1}{n+1} \leq e^{1/n} -1 \leq \frac{1}{n-1}

But, by the sandwich theorem for limits, we have that \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} e^{1/n} -1 = 0, so finally by the algebra of limits, \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} e^{1/n} =1. This proves the first case.

Secondly, if h\in\mathbb{R}^+ cannot be written in the form \frac{1}{n}, then by the Archimedes principle, there exists an integer k such that

\frac{1}{n-1} \leq h \leq \frac{1}{n} \implies h(n-1) \leq 1 \leq hn \quad \text{(1)}

Then, taking the reciprocal of each terms, we have n-1 \leq \frac{1}{h} \leq n, and so $latex $. Then, recall that

(1+\frac{1}{n})^n \leq e \leq (1+ \frac{1}{n-2})^{n-1} \implies (1+\frac{1}{n})^{hn} \leq e^h \leq (1+\frac{1}{n-2})^{h(n-1)} \quad \text{(2)}

Due to (1) and (2), we have

1+\frac{1}{n} \leq e^h \leq 1+\frac{1}{n-2} \implies \frac{1}{n} \leq e^h -1 \leq \frac{1}{n-2}

And again, by the sandwich theorem, we have \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} e^h = 1. Combining the result for both cases, we can finally confirm that,

f'(x) = f(x) \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} = f(x) = e^x\quad\square